Search results

Hopefully people cant jump right in with 4-5 ranks on any of the paths (at least in the beginning). You still have to find a Teacher to take the path, so hopefully the local plot teams gateway it a bit with some good roleplay. I wouldn't be opposed to each rank needing a new Teaching, or some...

Sourced from other people: Generic option: Drop the mystic, just Wood Elves. Other names (will add more if they come up): Satyrii

+1 added

Easter plus tax day both got me missing this one, and Ember missing due to Easter.

Paid for me, because screw it I'll just be tired in the morning. Still working on people to bring with.

Totally interested, totally doubt I can go. Just wanted to post so I can pout about it.

Did Jesse happen to say how payment would work for that? Pay twice to play twice? One payment plays all?

Disclaimer: The following are merely personal observations of someone who plays a rogue in Denver. No idea about actual numbers. I wouldn't call it an even spread. Scout, Rogue, and Adept tend to be a bit under-represented vs Fighter, Templar, and Scholar as far as I can tell. Maybe not Scout...

I'm doing some build cap planning with people and was curious: will this be an xp-generating event (seems like it from use of Logistics) and if so, how much (half day, full day, etc)?

So say we all.

^ ringmesh.com lots of players in denver swear by it

Those c-scholar spells are a great example. Solid. How about warriors and rogues? Preventing damage seems a pretty poor example, since that kind of thing exists all throughout the rules. I'm talking can your class' abilities take yourself and/or someone else from -1 to 1? It's a bit silly to be...

So they aren't the best at it (by perhaps even not good at it), or it doesn't last as long, or its niche, but it is still there in some form. If potions went to earth scrolls, what do you think about other classes having have some sort of very bad healing or niche status removal skills? Because...

Okay, so we've isolated an exception in the crafting rules. That's great! That's what we're trying to get rid of. But before we do that, let's ask: why is it there? I think it's perfectly clear from my prior responses that I'm not some game-theory guru. I'm just poking at the system placed in...

Especially compared to something like, say, your average rogue.

I believe they are already extremely valuable with the other changes that have been made.

Is it? What if, instead of changing which people could remove effects, you changed which effects allow you to still drink a potion (change ability to self remove)? You then still need a friend, but it isn't required to be an earth caster.

Do your teams keep all the potions on one person? Honest curiosity. Seems silly when everyone can use them. I agree that people would absolutely spend the build to use them. I believe they would do it because they felt it was necessary, which seems contrary to how things are being designed in...

I would guess it will be up to your local plot team.

Two issues I see with it: 1. It is occuring on top of removal of cloak/bane items and spell per day items (so more things will land, and there will be fewer ways to remove them) 2. It creates a lynchpin issue. Taking out one or two characters puts an entire group at risk. At least with potions...