Search results

Anyone interested in this can read here viewtopic.php?f=79&t=9964 For an update.

Constructive doesn't always mean positive. I gave my opinion and cited past experience, don't like it, don't ask I guess. Sorry if my opinion hurts feelings :oops:

We where asked for our comments.

Not sure I like the idea of a faceless set of names that a list of people can log onto in order to mod topics. It has killed some boards I've frequented. Bit biased from past expirence, but take it with a grain of salt.

Queues have been gone on briarcliff for a few days now. If anyone wants to play with us you can contact me "apothesis" or "zeke" and we can get you a guild invite.

We have a few alliance people that play on Briarcliff, though the server is pretty full and has queue times during peak hours.

If the ohio chapter gets to continue hosting events, you will be completely fine with the alliance larp rulebook and the rulebook addendum thats posted in the rules forum. We use the national rules for everything except for when things are not defined on a national level yet, and follow suit...

viewtopic.php?f=93&t=9692 Can you play a wylderkin that is based on an animal that is OOG extinct? Would this be a chapter specific issue, or an alliance as a whole issue considering the transfer of a character to other chapters would be possible?

Agreed, but it wouldnt hurt to see what is said, or at least start the discussion. Typically some of the things that get owner clairification come from the ARC board.

We could just submit it to ARC to end the discussion. Though I have a feeling the answer will be chapter dependant in some way.

what if those animals are not extinct in a given chapter, in that case wouldnt not allowing them be oog 4th wall breaking? I dont see an issue with sabertooth tigar sarr either, though I admit I never asked in the old topic. Like I said though this was already confirmed as ok, and I believe...

It's less of a matter about wether I know or not and more a matter of what scientist agree upon. Leptarctus is a mustelidae, which can range in looks very slightly and still remain within that grouping. The slight variation that is possible Is IMO close enough that a PCs costuming would not...

How diffrent would a simple costume for any of those mentioned creatures be? Color is based on environment which again..is chapter specific. A bear costume could even be interchangeable with the mentioned animal because most if not all PC wylderkyn do not look exactly like..most of the time any...

like a weasle

I didnt speculate. Scientists classify it as a mustelidae...which is pretty much a weasle, so give it weasle racials, and the roleplay is not a rule, it is a chapter based thing so it honestly can be w/e you want it too just write it up and get it approved.

after a quick wiki Id say just give it ferret or otter racials and say you are a Leptarctus, a ferret, or a weasle/whatever since it is pretty much the same thing.

I dunno what a Leptarctus is but I bet they ate stuff smaller than them... it might have been plants or smaller creatures, I didnt want to wiki it so I dunno. They bred with the other sex. If they ate plants they where probly mildly docile and lived in groups of some sort..if they ate creatures...

I always considered the diffrence as mythological being in the magical beast catagory from dnd 3.5, and animals being in the animal type. The seperation was that mytholgical creatures have near, equal, or greater than human intelligence, while animals are capped at 3. also..mythological...

There was a discussion on the old boards about extinct animals..they where ok'd at that time.

I like to wear a wizard style hat. Sort of like a sorting hat like from harry potter (if you where at the national event I had the brown robes and hat). My hat recently got trampled a bit, so it is kind of messed up. Rather than find another one like it I was wondering if anyone could make a...