Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
CMA
CMA
Freeplay
Beta
Rules Wiki
Discord
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
What's new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Latest activity
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
D
Dragonlord363
replied to the thread
Enhance Signature Spell + Foundation's Armament
.
Is this stated somewhere in the rulebook? I was looking through the current rulebook and the 2.1 draft and I was unable to find anything...
Yesterday at 9:06 PM
tieran
replied to the thread
Enhance Signature Spell + Foundation's Armament
.
1. No. 2. N/A
Yesterday at 7:13 PM
D
Dragonlord363
posted the thread
Enhance Signature Spell + Foundation's Armament
in
Beta Rules Questions and Feedback
.
Foundation's Armament lets you double the damage of a signature spell when using a Foundation Strike. My question is: 1: Does the...
Yesterday at 7:02 PM
P
Pewpewurface
replied to the thread
Splitting Spoils from Town Endeavors
.
A proposed addendum to the town auction system we currently have in place. The significant ammount of production items and superior...
Yesterday at 10:37 AM
T
tarsus
reacted to
Aramente_Viezd's post
in the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
with
Like
.
Added magic items section to the starting items. Thank you!
Saturday at 7:57 PM
V
Venrick
reacted to
Aramente_Viezd's post
in the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
with
Like
.
I will bring this to ARC to have a final rules calling and update the text as needed. Thank you
Saturday at 3:33 PM
tieran
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Both the live and beta CMAs refer to Vengeance damage (in the ritual description) as un”not avoidable in any manner.” Similarly, the...
Saturday at 3:10 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
I will bring this to ARC to have a final rules calling and update the text as needed. Thank you
Saturday at 2:52 PM
Aramente_Viezd
reacted to
Venrick's post
in the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
with
Like
.
Assuming that's the CMA, my only concern is that neither the love or beta CMA gives the example of non reduction of damage. I had an...
Saturday at 2:51 PM
V
Venrick
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Assuming that's the CMA, my only concern is that neither the love or beta CMA gives the example of non reduction of damage. I had an...
Saturday at 2:47 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Added tinkering to skill table. Thank you
Saturday at 2:43 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Removed "of". Thank you
Saturday at 2:41 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Modified to, "This effect will kill a living target (the target becomes dead) and instantly raises them as a Greater Undead under the...
Saturday at 2:40 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Added the following phrase, "For more information on Vengeance, please see the ritual effect listed on the Character Management...
Saturday at 2:37 PM
Aramente_Viezd
replied to the thread
Alliance Rulebook 2.1 Draft for Player Review
.
Removed the second instance of this sentence. Thank you
Saturday at 2:34 PM
Home
What's new
Top