"A weapon swing should progress between
45 to 90 degrees. If you are merely moving your
wrist back and forth to cause your damage, then
you are not fighting correctly and may be subject
to disciplinary action" Page 94 ARB 1.3
Recently this question came up about how to rule on weapon swings. Some parties questioned if they could bring their weapons back between 45-90 degrees by pulling their wrist all the way back while leaving their arm extended, while others implied that to do so was improper. (Think shoulder to shoulder, or the classic windshield wiper, but with the weapon coming back first)
Is the intent of the weapon swing clarification in the ARB there to judge arm rotation (bringing your arm back to a 45-90 degree angle) before changing locations for your next hit, or is the clarification about wrist flicks there to imply you should not rotate your wrist to hit an arm then a leg (for example) without the weapon moving back at least 45-90 degrees.
How is this ruled in your chapters?
45 to 90 degrees. If you are merely moving your
wrist back and forth to cause your damage, then
you are not fighting correctly and may be subject
to disciplinary action" Page 94 ARB 1.3
Recently this question came up about how to rule on weapon swings. Some parties questioned if they could bring their weapons back between 45-90 degrees by pulling their wrist all the way back while leaving their arm extended, while others implied that to do so was improper. (Think shoulder to shoulder, or the classic windshield wiper, but with the weapon coming back first)
Is the intent of the weapon swing clarification in the ARB there to judge arm rotation (bringing your arm back to a 45-90 degree angle) before changing locations for your next hit, or is the clarification about wrist flicks there to imply you should not rotate your wrist to hit an arm then a leg (for example) without the weapon moving back at least 45-90 degrees.
How is this ruled in your chapters?
Last edited: