What do you think of this case?

Here's an article that was on the front page of the Pocono Record today. I think it is one of my most interesting cases.

http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.d ... /805080349

Profiling alleged in drug arrest at Toby Depot

By Andrew Scott
Pocono Record Writer
May 08, 2008

TOBYHANNA — An American citizen of Middle Eastern descent says drug possession charges against him were a result of profiling, which he says occurred when he stopped with a friend at the Tobyhanna Army Depot to ask directions and was arrested after khat was found in their vehicle.

Jabra Abdulmajid, 28, who owns a grocery store in Buffalo, N.Y., is awaiting trial on khat possession charges, according to court records.

Khat (pronounced "cot") is a stimulant derived from a shrub native to northeastern Africa and the Middle East. Its effects are similar to but less intense than those of methamphetamine or cocaine, according to information at www.streetdrugs.org.

Attorney Michael Ventrella, who is representing Abdulmajid, has filed a memorandum for an omnibus pretrial motion challenging the case. The memorandum gives the following account:

On the early morning of Oct. 10, Abdulmajid was a passenger in a vehicle driven by a friend, identified only as "Ms. Ortiz," heading from Buffalo to New York City. Ortiz was looking for a place to stop for the night, turned off Interstate 380 South at the Tobyhanna exit and got lost.

Abdulmajid was asleep in the passenger seat, unaware the driver had turned off the highway and was lost. Ortiz pulled into the Tobyhanna Army Depot to ask for directions and to use a restroom.

Officer Jason Orenich was on duty at the security gate and asked Ortiz for identification. Orenich learned her driver's license had been suspended. Abdulmajid was found to have a valid license and be an American citizen with no criminal record.

Orenich asked Ortiz to sign a form giving consent to search her vehicle. She did so, believing she had no choice and nothing to hide.

Orenich later said at a district court preliminary hearing that not every vehicle is stopped and searched, depending on how busy things are at the depot.

Orenich searched the vehicle and found a green substance that at first appeared to be marijuana in a baggie on the front seat. Ortiz told him it was herbal tea, a common use for khat.

Orenich also found $26,755.75 in cash and then called Pocono Mountain Regional Police, who arrived and took Abdulmajid into custody. A police dog sniffed the money and gave a reaction, which officers interpreted as the money testing positive for the presence of drugs, which police said is not unusual.

Abdulmajid was arrested and taken to police headquarters. Ortiz later signed a stipulation forfeiting the money, even though the money was not hers. The green substance found in her vehicle turned out to be khat.

Police Officer Matt Nero later said at the preliminary hearing that there was no evidence of possession with intent to deliver and that the money was confiscated because it alerted the dog and because of how the money was packaged. Nero said it is not illegal to carry large sums of money.

Ventrella's memorandum challenges the case against Abdulmajid, saying the Commonwealth (prosecution) has not established that:

Local police have jurisdiction on federal property such as the Tobyhanna Army Depot.
Khat is illegal in the U.S.

The memorandum raises also the following points:

It denies due process to charge someone based on a law that's not published or distributed through normal means. In other words, if someone is found with khat and has no way of knowing it's illegal, he/she should not be held criminally liable.

The search of Ortiz's vehicle was illegal and the result of profiling.

The law allowing the Secretary of Health to designate new drugs as illegal is unconstitutional.

Since the Commonwealth cannot show a connection between the confiscated money and any illegal activity, the money should be returned.

Attorneys on both sides have declined to comment until after the case is resolved.
 
Interesting, but admit it Mike. You're took it cause you get to go after a cop named Nero, right?
 
He's declining to comment until after the case is reolved.
 
I am half and half on this. I do feel bad for that guy though. I like how the woman signed a form to take away the money even though it didn't belong to her.
 
um, I can't help but wonder why someone would be driving with $26,755.75 in cash...
 
Actually Mike, i hate to say it, but you're wrong on Khat not being illegal in the Unites States. Cathine is schedule IV, and Cathinone is schedule I. The 1993 DEA ruling establishing this effectively outlawed Khat. There have been several seizures of Khat, thus establishing precedent that it is in fact, illegal.
 
Aaeunnimbus said:
Actually Mike, i hate to say it, but you're wrong on Khat not being illegal in the Unites States. Cathine is schedule IV, and Cathinone is schedule I. The 1993 DEA ruling establishing this effectively outlawed Khat. There have been several seizures of Khat, thus establishing precedent that it is in fact, illegal.

Damn, you're right! I'm so stupid. I can't believe that I don't know the law. I must be completely incompetent and deserving of a malpractice suit against me.

Oh wait! That wasn't my argument.

1. The law you are referring to is a federal law. He was charged under state law, so what you just posted is completely irrelevant.

2. The state law allows the Secretary of Health to add drugs to the list of illegal substances. This violates the separation of powers and gives the executive branch power to make laws. I say that is unconstitutional, and if I win, then that means khat is not illegal because the law was never passed by the legislature.

3. When the Secretary added khat a few years ago, it was posted in a journal called the Pennsylvania Bulletin, read by officers and lawyers, but no one else really. In the years since, the legislature never adopted the Secretary's addition and so it has not been added into the published laws of Pennsylvania. Therefore, my argument is that if it isn't in the laws, it's not a law. Due Process requires that citizens are informed of changes in the law, and publication in the PA Bulletin doesn't count. Therefore, khat is not illegal because it has not been added to our laws.

Seriously, I have thought this through and I do know what I am doing.
 
Fearless Leader said:
Seriously, I have thought this through and I do know what I am doing.

I trust your competence as an attorney, and I'm sorry if my post seemed to indicate otherwise. My apologies. I concur with there being no grounds to hold the confiscated money since it can't be directly tied to any illegal act. I also agree that the ability of the PA Secretary of Health being able to add drugs to the list of illegal substances violates separation of powers and gives the executive branch undue power. I also agree that the fact that the law being only published in a journal no one other than professionals read makes this an interesting Ignorantia legis neminem excusat issue. Profiling..also a definite possibility. My only issue is how does federal and state law interact on drug possession charges?
 
Aaeunnimbus said:
Fearless Leader said:
Seriously, I have thought this through and I do know what I am doing.

I trust your competence as an attorney, and I'm sorry if my post seemed to indicate otherwise. My apologies.

Sorry I overreacted.

Aaeunnimbus said:
I concur with there being no grounds to hold the confiscated money since it can't be directly tied to any illegal act. I also agree that the ability of the PA Secretary of Health being able to add drugs to the list of illegal substances violates separation of powers and gives the executive branch undue power. I also agree that the fact that the law being only published in a journal no one other than professionals read makes this an interesting Ignorantia legis neminem excusat issue. Profiling..also a definite possibility. My only issue is how does federal and state law interact on drug possession charges?

It doesn't really.... except, of course, that if I win, the feds could technically come in and charge him. Doubt they care about this guy though.
 
Fearless Leader said:
It doesn't really.... except, of course, that if I win, the feds could technically come in and charge him. Doubt they care about this guy though.

Yeah. I know that in PA there were two large seizures, one in September of 2007 in Philadelphia (700 lbs), and another in December 2004 in Luzerne county. However, in this case, I DOUBT highly there was any intent to distribute. Also, for my own curiosity, if you know and are allowed to say, what country is Mr.Abdulmajid from origionally, or if he was American born, what country is his family from?. I want to guess Yemen.
 
Aaeunnimbus said:
Fearless Leader said:
It doesn't really.... except, of course, that if I win, the feds could technically come in and charge him. Doubt they care about this guy though.

Yeah. I know that in PA there were two large seizures, one in September of 2007 in Philadelphia (700 lbs), and another in December 2004 in Luzerne county. However, in this case, I DOUBT highly there was any intent to distribute.

Which is why he was only charged with simple possession. And without an intent to distribute there is no legitimate reason to confiscate the money.

Aaeunnimbus said:
Also, for my own curiosity, if you know and are allowed to say, what country is Mr.Abdulmajid from origionally, or if he was American born, what country is his family from?. I want to guess Yemen.

You're right. But he's been an American for about 7 years now.
 
Fearless Leader said:
Aaeunnimbus said:
Also, for my own curiosity, if you know and are allowed to say, what country is Mr.Abdulmajid from originally, or if he was American born, what country is his family from?. I want to guess Yemen.

You're right. But he's been an American for about 7 years now.

I figured as much. In Yemen, Khat chewing is pretty much an every day regular thing. Same with Somalia and Ethiopia. It's fairly similar to coffee where it fits in with social ritual. It would be like someone from the USA who's a longtime, hardcore coffee drinker moving to another country, and finding out that it's illegal.
 
Khat is a BIG thorny problem in the Twin Cities due to the large Somali population that brought it over with them at first as a cultural reminder, but then it escalated to ridiculous, and harmful, proportions.

And it is really wierd smelling, dental tarring stuff, too.

(We had a few Somali youths try to sell some of it to a few of our members while having a Fight Practice in Como Park. After it was revealed that we had a few "security employed" folks present, they scampered off...)
 
Tough and interesting. While I agree the charges probably should be dropped, I do wanna point out a couple things about the profiling. I've done gate security at a military post, and you ID everyone if they a) don't have military post sticker displayed or b) if they aren't in uniform. Then, once the stop was made, the driver had no license. I'd say that calls for looking into, since that is illegal. Then the guy on duty isn't DEA trained, and if I found a baggie of "herbal tea" with 25k in cash in the car, I'd be calling into my superiors and holding them till further stuff could be looked into.
Plus, and I hate to say this because I really don't consider myself racist in any way (and neither does my mexican-american goddaughter ;) ) but military personnell are gonna look at anyone who appears to be middle eastern approaching a post a little more carefully. They just are, it's somewhat human nature. If trolls have been hitting caravans and one walks into the tavern, you may not draw weapons but you do keep a closer eye on him than, say, an elf. Tell me ya don't! *grin* Anyway, light heartedness aside, it sucks but people of middle eastern decent or birth need to be aware of this and watch they don't do something silly to draw more attention to themselves, like drive up to an army post with the driver not having a valid license, same way when I was in the army and would go to Juarez to hit the bars, I knew us GI's didn't go off on our own after dark or we'd get picked up/harassed by the mexican cops.
 
Back
Top