Off the top of my head from what I recall:Marcena said:What changes do we have so far? All I know is the thing about getting rid of Detect Magic.
Marcena said:What changes do we have so far? All I know is the thing about getting rid of Detect Magic.
tieran said:Dreamingfurther said:What! I thought that comment clearly meant the end of 08 beginning of 09... wow I don't think I'll even bother reading posts about the new book until it says. "Order your new rulebook now, it has been released"
Well you've got to figure that the owners are probably going to want to discuss further rules stuff at the Symposium which is not until the end of August.
Which leaves 3-4 months to write, proof & edit the book.
Based on past experience, that is highly unlikely.
But possible, I suppose.
People get rules confused with old editions, future editions, desired rules and completely different games. Putting up the proposals will not significantly contribute not detract from that. He asked a question, and I answered as best I could. I don't see it as any worse than speculating about rules changes we wish we could have or want to propose ("Hey, wouldn't it be cool if the rule was this...").Fearless Leader said:Geez, guy, do you mind? Even stuff that was passed may get unpassed at the Symposium, and we don't need people thinking the rule has already changed when it hasn't.
No, we had a different one. You'd stated that you're afraid of public opinion weighing in prior to finalization, and I'm all for talking about it and getting excited and figuring out what could be fun and interesting. I understand if you want to say "these are not final", but deleting them seems kind of silly. Heck, I've been a proponent of 1.5 profs for two-handers and short-sword length claws for years, long before there was an Alliance, much less discussing a new edition of the Alliance rulebook. Is such discussion now verboten?Didn't we already have this discussion?
Sunnfire said:You will have a hard time convincing me that you paid 17 build (or more depending on race/primary secondary school), to cast a spell that has had no real in-game use for years.
In fact, unless you could get my logistics staff to confirm that your 1st level celestial spell every event was detect magic, I would probably just laugh at you.
obcidian_bandit said:Pff, says the only fighter I know with a celestial spell. (But he memorizes Disarm, at least that's useful.)
jpariury said:Does "next winter" mean "this coming winter" or "the winter after that"?Fearless Leader said:The way things are going, I wouldn't plan on a new Rule Book until next winter, with the new rules going into effect next season.
My next season is autumn... we play pretty year-round, so that phrase is more than a little imprecise for me.
Maxondaerth said:*ahem*obcidian_bandit said:Pff, says the only fighter I know with a celestial spell. (But he memorizes Disarm, at least that's useful.)
Sheesh, ya move away and he forgets everything.
And I agree, there is no higher purpose to spending build than for character flavor/RP purposes.
tieran said:Go through a couple more rules changes.
Then you'll get used to it.