You'd need to use four of them. Doing some math, you need a 4" diameter sphere to meet the phys rep size requirements (it actually comes out to 33.5 cubic inches but why quibble?) These bottles are roughly 2" in diameter and since you're cube in order to come up with volume, that means 4 times and not double the number of items half the size.Ironleaf said:i dont know about using them as gas globes but..... Gas traps phis reps.
Tim
markusdark said:Talen said:I'm interested in seeing how well those things throw/safetystuff. Might have to put a little foam "cap" over the one they already have, if it'll fit in an eye socket?
spell packets fit in eye sockets
thrusting tips fit in eye sockets
elbows fit in eye sockets
The 'eye socket' argument is an old, tired one. If it isn't rigid, it should be fine.
jpariury said:Don't get me wrong, I'm all for using these. They look hella cool. But if we're going to allow these, I see no reason why we shouldn't ditch the thrown weapon construction section that states "smallest dimension must be at least 3 inches in diameter". Why should a thrown weapon be held to a higher standard than a foam globe?
WonkotheSane said:Have these gas globe phys reps been approved anywhere? I think they look pretty cool and would like to use them when I pick up alchemy.
markusdark said:You'd need to use four of them. Doing some math, you need a 4" diameter sphere to meet the phys rep size requirements (it actually comes out to 33.5 cubic inches but why quibble?) These bottles are roughly 2" in diameter and since you're cube in order to come up with volume, that means 4 times and not double the number of items half the size.