tieran said:
Alvatar-
I have made no claim that I know which things are good and which are evil.
I am sorry. I meant to say that you, as an individual, have some knowledge of good and evil. I did not mean to imply that you knew what was absolutely good or absolutely evil.
tieran said:
All I am saying, for the third or fourth time, is that the goodness or evilness of a thing is completely independant of anyone's belief about it.
Good and evil are most certainly not subjective.
The opinion of a society (and read this carefully) only determines what that society believes to be good or evil. Those beliefs are not neccesarily correct.
If you believe the a leaf to be green, and everyone else believes it to be purple, does that make you wrong?
If the leaf is green it is green, it matters not what other people's opinion on its color is.
The same is true of good and evil. A thing either is good or it is evil. Slavery is either good or evil. Necromancy is either good or evil. Chivalry is either good or evil.
I apologize for not stating this clearly enough for you to understand it the first several times.
That is where I disagree. Actions are neutral, it is the intent behind the action that gives individuals, groups, societies and nations the ability to determine if the action is good or evil. It is all based on perception, and perception based conclusions are always subjective to the person or people who perceive it.
For your leaf example: Why do I believe the leaf to be green? Why does everyone else believe it to be purple? Am I looking at the leaf at an odd angle, therefore seeing something the others cannot see? Or did I see the leaf in a different light then everyone else, which changes the perceived color of the leaf? Am I unable to see purple and so therefore see green?
Is killing another sentient being evil? That depends why person A killed person B. The action itself is not evil, just the intent behind it can be. If it is murder, then it is often considered evil. If it is to defend yourself or someone else it is generally considered good. The action is the same, the intent is not.
Is slavery evil? It can be. I was a slave for a time, which was not a pleasant experience by the way, for minotaurs and that was definately not good. However, I have seen slavery that was more akin to a communist society where the "slaves" are protected, fed, treated well, and given incentives for hard work where the "citizens" are the ones that govern and form the military. Is that latter form of slavery evil? I would say no, but that is just my opinion.
Is chivalry evil? Chivalry is merely a form of etiquette. Evil people can easily be chivalrous, and good people can easily be ignorant. Once again, the action of being chivalrous is not evil, nor is it good. A smart evil-doer would be chivalrous to gain trust before killing/stealing/destroying/whatever. Does that make chivalry evil? No. It might make the intent behind the use of chivalry evil, though.
The same can be said of many other things. However I think this more clearly sums up my argument for this debate. Basically, good and evil are not absolute. There are many actions considered to be evil when, in fact, they have just been associated with those who have used those actions with evil intent.
Regards,
Alavatar Peece
Red Wizard of the Crossroads
P.S. I did not speak about Chaosmancy because as soon as anyone states that they consider something worse then that they are immediately accused of being a necromancer or associating with necromancers. Therefore, I refuse to discuss anything on that topic until people can debate it without turning it into a witch hunt.